Today's New York Times strikes a blow against historical research on behalf of Scottish national pride. Normally, I would disapprove.
But in this case, I must agree with the logic presented by Alexander McCall Smith. Just because haggis appears in a 17th-century English cookbook does not make the dish English.
Here's a taste:
"So the haggis is clearly Scottish, as Robert Burns understood full well when he wrote his famous poem in its praise. If one’s national bard writes a poem to a dish consisting of chopped-up offal cooked in a sheep’s stomach together with oatmeal and spices and secured with a curious pin, then that dish must be authentically national."
1 comment:
I am speechless...except for one comment: If it's not Scottish, it's CRAP!
Post a Comment